About Me

Name: Billy email...
Email: MADBillyD@aol.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Thursday Blogging

Blogging on Thursday will be  later in the afternoon or may not be until evening. I have to work in the morning  and then in the afternoon I need to take my mom to the doctor. Thanks so much for understanding.

Tags: blogging  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Democrats struggle to find unity on health plan...

Democrats are struggling to bridge differences among their rank and file to push health overhaul legislation through Congress and fulfill President Barack Obama's goal of signing a bill this year.
In the wake of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's announcement that the Democratic bill would include the option of a government insurance plan, moderates in his own party lost no time in voicing their displeasure. The Nevada Democrat needs every Democrat to break the filibusters that Republicans are vowing to mount. But some of the moderates refuse to say whether they'll stick with their leader on procedural votes, let alone those on the merits of the bill.
"Until I've seen everything, I'm not for anything," moderate Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., told home-state reporters in a conference call Wednesday. He said he was undecided on Reid's bill, and would prefer an approach where states could opt into a government insurance plan, instead of being permitted to opt out, as Reid would allow.
 

 

But, "I'm keeping an open mind," Nelson said. "Doing nothing is not one of the things that we can consider."

In the House, Speaker Nancy Pelosi has been laboring to finalize a consensus health care bill amid disagreements among Democrats.
(We the voters and tax payers of this nation need to be watching and hold people like Sen. Nelson to the promise of  looking out for the America people. We don't need government health care. Yes the health care system needs to change but it is still the best health care in the world. If it is not why do people come from around the world to be treated. Read more of the above story  Democrats struggle to find unity on health plan...)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama signs 'hate crimes' bill - Christian broadcasters concerned

The "hate crimes" bill approved recently by Congress could be a problem for broadcasters -- most importantly, Christian broadcasters -- now that it has been signed into law.

 

 

President Barack Obama has signed into law a measure that adds to the list of federal hate crimes attacks on people based on their sexual orientation.
Congress approved the legislation last week as part of the $680-billion FY 2010 Defense Authorization bill. Appended to the hate crimes amendment was a statement ensuring that a religious leader or any other person cannot be prosecuted on the bases if his or her speech, beliefs, or association.
 
But Craig Parshall, chief counsel for National Religious Broadcasters (NRB), discounts that statement, pointing out that such laws in other countries have been used to silence people of faith. He believes the law approved by Congress is potentially dangerous as it relates to comments made about homosexuality or another religion.
 
"Under the criminal law of incitement, if something is said in a broadcast that another person uses as a motivation to go out and commit an act of what they call 'bodily injury' in the statute, then a broadcaster could be held criminally liable," he explains. ( Obama signs 'hate crimes' bill - Christian broadcasters concerned  )
 
(Look out. I even heard yesterday a lady who wrote something against a gay rights march over in England  has gotten in to trouble. So could that happen here in the good old USA with laws like this  one  look out.)
Tags: obama   faith  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rush Limbaugh was really done in by his own words

As it began to look as though his past, um, let’s say “racial indelicacies” would cost Rush Limbaugh a shot at partial ownership of the NFL’s St. Louis Rams, the right-wing radio hustler offered this interpretation:

“This is about the ongoing effort by the left in this country, wherever you find them, in the media, the Democrat Party or wherever, to destroy conservatism, to prevent the mainstreaming of anyone who is prominent as a conservative. Therefore, this is about the future of the United States of America and what kind of country we are going to have.”
 
(The above is part of a column written by Tom Teepen. More of the column is below.)

Limbaugh was done in by Limbaugh. And it wasn’t his conservatism that tipped him up. 

“The NFL,” Limbaugh has said, “too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips ... ”

For my sins — which considering the punishment must be great and grave — I often listen to Limbaugh when I’m out and about in my car. This self-flagellation goes back more than a decade, and if I have ever heard him speak of any African-American figure with other than contempt and dismissal, and usually with a fillip of mockery, I can’t remember when.

The First Amendment’s right to free speech and press works well thanks in good part to the fact that while it protects writers and publishers, speakers and broadcasters from government interference, it doesn’t exempt them from the social consequences of their utterances.


 
(I want to know is Mr. Teepen also going to write a column against Jesse Jackson, and others who are part of the radical left. Far as what Rush said about players in the NFL looking like the  Bloods and the Crips look sadly at how many NFL players have gotten in trouble. Rush was punished for his political views. So next time Fox news hires somebody they should not hire those on the left and they have the right not to. If that happens look out for people like Mr. Teepen to have a cow. Read more of the above column  Rush Limbaugh was really done in by his own words.)
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barack Obama is the most powerful writer since Julius Caesar'

Rocco Landesman is President Obama's handpicked chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts. Last week he gave the keynote address to the 2009 Grantmakers in the Arts Conference. Those of us concerned about the politicization of life and art in the Age of Obama will not be consoled by a reading of Landesman's speech. The speech bears examination in its entirety, but Landesman's tribute to Obama is especially worth a look:

This is the first president that actually writes his own books since Teddy Roosevelt and arguably the first to write them really well since Lincoln. If you accept the premise, and I do, that the United States is the most powerful country in the world, then Barack Obama is the most powerful writer since Julius Caesar. That has to be good for American artists.

Landesman compares Obama favorably with Julius Caesar as "a powerful writer." Landesman is not referring to Obama's skills as a writer, but rather to the power he holds by virtue of his office. Some might think that the literary comparison sells Obama short. Caesar was something of a self-promoter and propagandist in his writing.

Yet Landesman knows Obama is like Caesar, somehow -- a friend asks, is it in the transformation of a republic into an empire with a divine ruler? Perhaps if Landesman had his wits about him, he would note instead that Obama is the most powerful speaker since the other JC.
 
(To be honest with you I don't care if some person can write great or not I care about who they are and in the case of a leader I care about how they lead. Some say Hitler was a great writer but was he a great leader no he was an evil leader. For the record I am not comparing Obama and Hitler I am just making a point. I wonder if Obama had cut the NEA from his spending plan if  Landesman would be talking about how great he was, I don't think he would be. Read more on this issue right here.) 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Castro's sister: She helped CIA against Cuban leaders

Juanita Castro, the younger sister of Cuban leaders Fidel and Raul Castro, worked for the CIA during some crucial years of the Cold War, she says in her new memoir.

Juanita Castro, originally a supporter of the Cuban revolution that brought Fidel Castro to power in 1959, said she became disillusioned by growing injustice.

"They wanted to talk to me because they had interesting things to tell me, and interesting things to ask of me, such as if I was willing to take that risk, if I was ready to listen to them. I was semi-shocked, but I said yes anyway," she told CNN affiliate Univision-Noticias 23 in Miami, Florida.
Univision's interviewer, journalist Maria Antonieta Collins, co-wrote the book. "My Brothers Fidel and Raul, the Secret History" was released Monday
Castro wrote that she agreed to help on the condition that she would not do anything violent against her brothers. She also refused payment when it was offered, she said.
 
(I have no idea what this lady must have gone through to have a brother who is an evil leader and wanting the Cuba people to be freed but at the same time not wanting her brothers to be hurt. Good for her and God Bless her. Pray for the people of Cuba and that they will soon have freedom. Read more of the above story Castro's sister: She helped CIA against Cuban leaders )
 
Tags: America   Cuba  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »