About Me

Name: Billy
Email: MADBillyD@gmail.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Botched abortion = suspended license

A late-term abortionist in Florida has temporarily lost his medical license.

 

The State Medical Board has suspended the license of James Pendergraft for two years and is requiring him to pay $20,000 in administrative costs. In addition, Pendergraft will be under three years' probation when his license is restored and under the direct supervision of a board-certified OB-GYN. 
 
Cheryl Sullinger (Operation Rescue)Cheryl Sullinger, spokesperson for Operation Rescue, indicates that in the latest case, the abortionist perforated the uterus of a woman and gave her an overdose of drugs.
 
"The Florida Board said that he had a flagrant disregard for the laws of the state of Florida and a willingness to endanger the lives and health of his pregnant patients," Sullinger reports. "I think that's a pretty strong condemnation of him and his lack of medical skills," she adds.

(This is good news. Anytime a doctor who kills babies is removed from the job all of us who care about women and the babies  should be very thankful and praise the Lord. Read more on this issue Botched abortion = suspended license.)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The federal government is closed Thanks to Blizzard

Another winter storm has come to the D.C. area, just days after one of the biggest storms in history dropped more than 20 inches of snow over the weekend.

Blizzard Warning has been extended to the entire D.C. area until 7 p.m. Wednesday.

ABC 7 Meteorologist Chris Naille says there are whiteout conditions in parts of the area already.

Naille says people across the region can expect visibility to drop to near zero, and to hear tree limbs crack and break during the higher wind gusts.

The federal government is closed.

(As much as I feel bad for the people of D.C. it is kind of a blessing that the offices of Uncle Sam has closed. So they can't do any harm to us. Read more of the above story Blizzard smacks battered region.)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Christian Group Should have Worked In Haiti Instead of Taking Children Out

 A lawyer for 10 U.S. missionaries detained in Haiti says parents of the children they're suspected of kidnapping told a judge they freely handed over their kids.

 

Aviol Fleurant says the parents' testimony means no law was broken, and "we can't talk any more about trafficking of human beings."


Fleurant said Tuesday he's "confident" the judge will  dismiss the case.


(This group might not had broken the law but there is a right way to do things. I believe this group meant well but instead of taking kids out of Haiti they should have stayed in Haiti and worked with a Christian group who was already in that nation. Those of us who are people of faith at times go some place and try to do something different instead of working with those who are already there. Read more on this issue Lawyer for Haiti missionaries: No laws broken.)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Valentine's Day ad over the line

Armani Exchange is being called into question over its controversial advertising.

 

The poster ad employs three frames -- two men embracing in the first frame, a man and woman in the middle, and two women in the last. Bill Johnson, executive director and board president of the American Decency Association (ADA), feels that no parent should want his or her child exposed to it. (   Valentine's Day ad over the line)



 


 



 
Bill Johnson (American Decency Association)"[Do] people really want their young person to be involved in premarital sex and [their] young man kissing another young man and [having] intimacy with a young man, or a woman with a woman or involved in a threesome?" Johnson asks. "I don't think so." The ADA board president believes people should feel indignation over the national chain's ad campaign and believes that Armani Exchange is pushing an agenda practiced by a small minority as much as it is trying to sell merchandise.


( The truth is that young people are having their lives ended because they didn't follow  God's will far as sexual activity goes.)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bill would ground teen drinkers

If Nebraska started taking the car keys from teenagers caught with alcohol, it could mean a lot fewer teens on the road.

That's the prediction from Mike Jamrozy, a junior at Omaha South High School.

He said a legislative proposal that ties the penalty for minor in possession to the privilege of driving could either work as a deterrent to underage drinking or lead to fewer teen drivers.

“That would be a whole lot less kids driving,” said Jamrozy, 16, who has been driving for 10 months. “That would definitely work.”
He was reacting to a bill advanced Monday by the Legislature's Judiciary Committee that would ground teens 18 or younger from driving if they were convicted of possessing, selling, distributing or consuming alcohol.

Others at South said such a penalty would work only in some cases. Some kids might drive illegally, for example.

“Thirty days is not that much,” said Billy Cap, 16, a sophomore.

Delon Ross, 15, said she doesn't hear of too many students at South getting MIPs, and because most of them don't drive, she wasn't sure how much effect such a law would have on her classmates.

Still, the sophomore told a friend: “That's a crappy rule.”
(We must do everything we can to stop teens from drinking. I would rather some teens be upset about this law than they be involved with 
anything to do with drinking. Also if my kids were involved far as drinking goes they would need to fear me more than what any state could do to them. Read more of the above story  Bill would ground teen drinkers.)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

John Rosemond Says Take Cell phones Away from Kids

Jon Akers, Director of the Kentucky Center for School Safety, has written an on-line essay calling on school systems to prohibit students from having cell phones in their possession during school hours (go to www.kysafeschools.org). He presents an iron-clad argument to the effect that student cell phones are not just unnecessary but also contribute to bullying, underachievement, sexual harassment, numerous disciplinary issues, including cheating, and even criminal activity. It goes without saying that they are one more distraction to a generation that is already suffering from distraction overload.
(The above is part of a column written by   John Rosemond. More of the column is below.)
In the course of his research, Akers learned that whereas almost all school systems initially attempted to prohibit or restrict student use of cell phones, most have ultimately capitulated to pressure from parents and students. In some cases, the obvious choice has been made to ignore violations; in others, the matter has been deferred by state-level bureaucrats to individual schools or districts. 
Regular readers of this column know I don’t believe a child (anyone under age 19 who is still dependent upon parental support) should have a cell phone until he/she is capable of paying for both the phone and the monthly bills. 
The problem of enforcement is complicated by parents who demand instant access to their children during the school day and therefore will not support attempts to enforce cell phone restrictions. In this regard, parents often point out the need for their kids to be able to contact them in the event of a school shooting or terrorist attack, the likelihood of which is miniscule. Besides, in situations of those sorts the last thing law enforcement wants is hundreds of parents racing toward and crowding around a threatened school, thus constituting a hindrance to emergency operations.
( I am a fan of Mr.   John Rosemond but this is one issue where I don't agree with him. No I don't believe kids should be able to use their cell phones during a normal school day but the news reported after the Columbine High School massacre - the way parents were able to keep in touch with their kids was by way of cell phone. Also with so many kids walking home from school and with many kids being left alone after school cell phones are a great way for parents to be able to know what their children are up to. Also cell phones might be something to punish your kids by taking away.  Read the whole column by John Rosemond right here.  )

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »