About Me

Name: Billy
Email: MADBillyD@gmail.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Pat Robertson infuriates Christian faithful with Alzheimer's comments

Pat Robertson has made many controversial statements over the years, such as suggesting that the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks were God's punishment for the U.S. tolerating abortion and homosexuality. His critics are usually those on the politically opposite spectrum of the conservative Christian leader, or outside the Christian faith. 

But the television evangelist's most recent statements -- condoning divorce when a spouse has Alzheimer's -- appears to have offended many Christians who feel it violates the sanctity of marriage and that most cherished of marriage vows: Til death do us part.

(Pat Robertson infuriates Christian faithful with Alzheimer's comments)
Tags: culture   faith  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Note to evangelicals: not every event calls for prayer

Evangelical Christians have been complaining about not being included in various commemorations of 9/11, whether in New York City, Washington, D.C., or even here in Canada. But we shouldn’t be.

During my last year of high school (in North Bay, Ontario), I was asked by our varsity basketball coach to pray before our games. I did as I was asked, praying the usual athlete’s prayer for safety, good refereeing, our best performance, and the like. But I was surprised to be asked, and a little confused. Northern Ontario in the mid-1970s was already pretty secularized and most of my teammates didn’t go to church.

A few months later, at our graduation dinner and dance (the equivalent of our “prom”), the president of the student council asked me, with about a minute’s notice, to offer a prayer before the dinner began. I was class valedictorian as well as leader of the only Christian group at the school, so I didn’t feel I could refuse. So I prayed a generic prayer to “God” and asked for the most general of blessings — but my qualms were growing.

That’s the last time I’ve said yes. The University of Manitoba asked me a few times to pray at their convocation, when I was on the faculty there in the 1990s, as did the University of British Columbia when I came out here to Vancouver in 1998. And by then, I’d made up my mind. Prayer is a wonderful thing, and too wonderful to serve as a brief gesture to Canada’s past or a way of adding a bit of extra solemnity to a secular occasion.

Public prayer of the sort in question is a ritual meant to express a single sentiment on behalf of a unified group to a deity they all wish to petition. It isn’t part of an exchange of views, such as a university debate or a media talk show. I enjoy participating in such exchanges. Nor is it an educational situation — such as the world religions courses I myself have taught for more than 20 years.

Prayer isn’t supposed to be an opportunity to proclaim or teach your faith to others. Instead, prayer is a form of speech offered on behalf of everyone present to God.

Evangelical Christians of all people shouldn’t agree to pray at public events such as 9/11 services. Prayer is too great to be sprinkled on a secular occasion. That’s why I’m against formal prayers also in North American legislatures, city councils, school boards, and the like. These institutions, from start to finish, have no intention of conducting their business “under God,” with constant reference to the Bible and Christian tradition, seeking the Kingdom of Heaven in all they do. 
(Note to evangelicals: not every event calls for prayer)
(Billy's Thoughts>>> I agree public prayer should not be used as a political tool to get our point across. At the same time when a follower of Jesus is asked to pray at a public event it gives us a change to bring honor to our Lord and show this world prayer is about talking to the Lord of our lives. If prayer is done right it can bring honor to Christ and touch others with his good news. Also what about other  followers of Jesus who are at these public events should we not encourage them by letting them know other followers of Jesus are there. I for one say keep praying at public events just keep your focus right and don't demand a right  to pray. I think too many followers of Jesus do that a good example of that would be prayers in the government schools.)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dinner with Ahmadinejad

The Columbia Spectator is the student newspaper at Columbia University, the school I was once proud to call my alma mater. A report in that newspaper raises the following question: Are leading American universities producing moral illiterates?
According to the Spectator, a group of students who are members of a group called CIRCA, the Columbia International Relations Council and Association, has been invited to attend a private dinner with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad when he travels to New York for the United Nations General Assembly meeting next week. A student spokesman for the group, asked if the invitation provoked controversy within CIRCA, seemed surprised by the question. “Everyone was really enthusiastic,” said Tim Chan. “They’re thrilled to have this opportunity.”

 

Ahmadinejad represents everything that campus liberals profess to hate. In order of importance, those things would be: (1) persecuting homosexuals; (2) cruel and abusive treatment of women; (3) brutal treatment of minorities; (4) shooting opponents of the regime in the streets; (5) restricting free speech; (6) building nuclear weapons; and (7) sponsoring terror worldwide. Tehran provides material and moral support for Bashar Assad’s murderous regime in Syria, which has mowed down protesters by the thousands in the past few months. The Iranian regime is also guilty of fetid anti-Semitism, and has the blood of many American soldiers who served in Iraq on its hands — though it isn’t clear that the latter two offenses rate very highly with Columbia students.

(Dinner with Ahmadinejad)
Something is inoculating Ahmadinejad from the total contempt members of the university community would ordinarily feel toward someone with his views and his behavior. It is impossible, for example, to imagine the university inviting fellow Holocaust denier and racist David Duke to speak to the students and faculty. And it’s equally impossible to imagine that students would be “thrilled” by a dinner invitation from Rev. Fred Phelps of the Westboro Baptist Church.
(Billy's Thoughts>>>>> The above column was written by  and she is right on. )
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Faith of Joe Lieberman

As we discuss his new bookThe Gift of Rest, in his Capitol Hill office, Sen. Joe Lieberman mentions his longtime friendship with National Review’s late founder, William F. Buckley Jr. Over 20 years ago, in 1988, Buckley famously endorsed Lieberman, who was challenging moderate Republican incumbent Lowell Weicker. The pair, both with ties toStamford, Conn. — Lieberman a native, Buckley a resident — remained close following Lieberman’s surprise victory. They exchanged letters and phone calls, and mused about politics and family.

“He teased me that year, to please not indulge in the fantasy that he would ever again vote for me,” Lieberman chuckles. Nonetheless, Buckley, he says, became a “major force in my life.” The political gap between Lieberman, a devout Orthodox Jew and Democrat, and Buckley, a devout Catholic and conservative, may have been steep, but the respect for each other’s intellectual and spiritual pursuits was constant. “It is my view, and I think Bill’s view as well, that faith precedes everything else,” Lieberman says.

Those discussions on faith — with Buckley, with family, with rabbis — have been on Lieberman’s mind this year. Now 69 years old, he has decided not to run for reelection in 2012. Instead of writing a tell-all memoir, or a polemic, he decided to publish a book about his religious life, a love letter to the Sabbath, which he observes, beginning every Friday at sundown, when he turns off the BlackBerry and hangs up the car keys.

 

In the style of Buckley’s own meditation on faith, Nearer, My God, Lieberman, in The Gift of Rest, encourages readers to mull their own religious practices, placing an emphasis on the value of tradition and commitment. He takes great joy in describing, in vivid detail, the sights and smells of the Jewish Sabbath, from the aroma of baked challah bread and kugel, a sweet noodle dish, to prayers with his children.

Lieberman also acknowledges his struggle, at times, with keeping the Sabbath. Obstacles, he says, have always appeared, from his stressful undergraduate years at Yale to his hectic Senate schedule, which often includes Friday evening or Saturday votes. “I’ve never really talked a lot about it, about why I do it and what we do,” he says. But as his time in Washington winds down, “I thought it’d be wonderful to invite the reader to come to a Sabbath,” he says. “It’s a millennia-old institution, more relevant than ever.

(The Faith of Joe Lieberman)

(Billy's Thoughts>>> As a born again soul I believe Jesus is the only way to God but still we can learn from people of other faiths. It is nice to see a soul in D.C. who lives for something more important than the next election.)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Big Blogging News and Thank You Note

I want thank all of you who have been my faithful readers here on my Townhall.com  blog. It has been a blessing to have this blog  for many years. However there is a saying all good things must come to an end. Today will be my last day of blogging here. Nope I am not giving up blogging I am just switching  to a different blog. This switch has nothing to do with Townhall doing  anything wrong in fact  the chances are I will still use  the Townhall.com  site for information for my blogging. 
Thank you Townhall  for allowing me to have a blog here. Starting next week the blog I have been posting audio to my radio commentary will be my main blog where you can read my thoughts about news, etc.  
I hope many of you will follow me to my new blog which will be on WordPress.com. 
The  name/link  for that blog is billydteacher.



Tags: blogging  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Pat Robertson Repudiates the Gospel."

This week on his television show Christian broadcaster Pat Robertson said a man would be morally justified to divorce his wife with Alzheimer's disease in order to marry another woman. The dementia-riddled wife is, Robertson said, "not there" anymore. This is more than an embarrassment. This is more than cruelty. This is a repudiation of the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Few Christians take Robertson all that seriously anymore. Most roll their eyes, and shake their heads when he makes another outlandish comment (for instance, defending China's brutal one-child abortion policy to identifying God's judgment on specific actions in the September 11 attacks, Hurricane Katrina, or the Haiti earthquake). This is serious, though, because it points to an issue that is much bigger than Robertson.

Marriage, the Scripture tells us, is an icon of something deeper, more ancient, more mysterious. The marriage union is a sign, the Apostle Paul announces, of the mystery of Christ and his church (Eph. 5). The husband, then, is to love his wife "as Christ loved the church" (Eph. 5:25). This love is defined not as the hormonal surge of romance but as a self-sacrificial crucifixion of self. The husband pictures Christ when he loves his wife by giving himself up for her.

At the arrest of Christ, his Bride, the church, forgot who she was, and denied who he was. He didn't divorce her. He didn't leave.

The Bride of Christ fled his side, and went back to their old ways of life. When Jesus came to them after the resurrection, the church was about the very thing they were doing when Jesus found them in the first place: out on the boats with their nets. Jesus didn't leave. He stood by his words, stood by his Bride, even to the Place of the Skull, and beyond.

A woman or a man with Alzheimer's can't do anything for you. There's no romance, no sex, no partnership, not even companionship. That's just the point. Because marriage is a Christ/church icon, a man loves his wife as his own flesh. He cannot sever her off from him simply because she isn't "useful" anymore.

("Pat Robertson Repudiates the Gospel.")

(Billy's Thoughts>>>>> Read more of the excellent above posting, )

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pat Robertson Says Divorce Okay if Spouse has Alzheimer's

Pat Robertson advised a viewer of yesterday's 700 Club to avoid putting a "guilt trip" on those who want to divorce a spouse with Alzheimer's. During the show's advice segment, a viewer asked Robertson how she should address a friend who was dating another woman "because his wife as he knows her is gone." Robertson said he would not fault anyone for doing this. He then went further by saying it would be understandable to divorce a spouse with the disease.

"That is a terribly hard thing," Robertson said. "I hate Alzheimer's. It is one of the most awful things because here is a loved one—this is the woman or man that you have loved for 20, 30, 40 years. And suddenly that person is gone. They're gone. They are gone. So, what he says basically is correct. But I know it sounds cruel, but if he's going to do something he should divorce her and start all over again. But to make sure she has custodial care and somebody looking after her."

Co-host Terry Meeuwsen asked Pat, "But isn't that the vow that we take when we marry someone? That it’s For better or for worse. For richer or poorer?"

Robertson said that the viewer's friend could obey this vow of "death till you part" because the disease was a "kind of death." Robertson said he would understand if someone started another relationship out of a need for companionship.

Robertson gave the example of a friend who faithfully visited his wife every day even though she could not remember his visits to illustrate the difficulty of caring for someone with the disease.

(Pat Robertson Says Divorce Okay if Spouse has Alzheimer's)

(Billy's Thoughts>>> It is time for Pat Robertson to retire. He has brought shame to the good news of Jesus. Yes he has done good things for the cause of Christ but  anymore his negatives are out numbering his good points. )

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Abortion-breast cancer link still being ignored

American Life League takes exception to the Komen Foundation donating money to Planned Parenthood, the biggest abortion-provider in America.

 

Komen, which raises money to do research for a cure for breast cancer, provides money to Planned Parenthood for mammograms and other services to detect the disease. But American Life League (ALL) founder Judie Brown tells OneNewsNow those grants allow Planned Parenthood to free up funds to do more abortions.
 
"We have pointed this out to Komen on numerous occasions and they have consistently refused to accept the facts," she reports. "Not only that, but the Komen Foundation is involved in the support and funding of human embryonic stem-cell research" -- research that involves killing a tiny human being.

(Abortion-breast cancer link still being ignored)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Perry 'wrestled with God' over his future

- Texas Governor Rick Perry told students Wednesday at the nation's largest evangelical university not to worry if they're still unsure which life goals to pursue. He assured students at Liberty University that God has them there for a purpose.

(Perry 'wrestled with God' over his future)


 

The Republican presidential candidate told the convocation of 12,000 students that after returning home from the Air Force at age 27, he was "lost" -- drifting with no sense of purpose.
 
"My faith journey is not the story of someone who turned to God because I wanted to," he said. "It was because I had nowhere else to turn.

(Billy's Thoughts>>> No matter what you think of the politics of this man you have to admit it is nice to see a leader who is not ashamed of his faith. Amen anyone?)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ObamaCare's days are numbered: Hope and Pray!

Christian attorney Mat Staver says a federal judge was right on the mark this week in deeming unconstitutional the "individual mandate" that is considered central to President Barack Obama's controversial healthcare reform law.

(ObamaCare's days are numbered)


 

The latest ruling involving ObamaCare, handed down on Tuesday by a federal judge in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, deemed it unconstitutional to force people to buy health insurance -- an element of the law otherwise known as the "individual mandate." The case is one of more than 30 lawsuits winding their way through the U.S. court system as individuals and groups challenge the Obama administration's signature healthcare reform law.

(Billy's Thoughts>>> Lets all hope and pray all of this will lead to Obamacare being removed from the law of the land.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Republican replaces the Oscar Meyer Congressman

The narrative going around is that Jewish Democrats are finally waking up to the utter disaster that is Barack Obama. His hostile treatment of Israel finally caused Jews to wake up, stop acting like ostriches, and learn who their friends are. The Jewish migration to the Republican Party has begun, and the realignment is well under way.

Conservative Republicans like myself would be delighted by this scenario, except for one small problem.

It is not true.

Two influential Jewish Democrats crossed party lines, and one of them does support the theory of an anti-Obama protest. That would be former Mayor Ed Koch.

Mayor Koch is a Jewish Democrat, and he has crossed party lines before. He supported President George W. Bush for reelection in 2004. He said that he disagreed with President Bush on virtually every domestic issue, but the primary issue in the campaign was keeping us safe. Ed Koch loves Israel, and he knew President Bush did as well. Mayor Koch voted for President Obama but has been critical of his Israel stances while other Jewish Democrats like Weiner and Schumer cowered in the corner. In short, Weiner an Schumer were liberals first and Jews second. Ed Koch knows who he is, and that is a proud American Jew. He is not blinded by leftist ideology, making a crossover vote possible.

(Billy's Thoughts>>> The above post is written by a Jewish blogger and he is right on. If you like read the whole post   

Republican replaces the Oscar Meyer Congressman.)

 

eyer Congressman

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Blogging News One Day Away

One day from today I will have big blogging news to report to you. That is right this Friday I will give you some big and exciting news that I hope will bless you.


Tags: blogging  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234Next »